Children are people who have physical or mental limitations. Limitation understand everything, tends to bring negative influences into themselves and can cause it to do damage (juvenile delinquency) or even become perpetrators of delinquency (a criminal offense). 3 of 1997 on Juvenile Justice (Juvenile Court Act), in principle, was born to protect and nurture children in conflict with the law (ABH). However, it was legally incapable angle Court Law provide legal protection against the ABH. Thus was born the amount of number 11 of 2012 on the Criminal Justice System Child (Law SPPA) to replace the Juvenile Justice Act. In the case of change of the Act there are striking differences in issues related to children in the examination of the case law SPPA. The purpose of this paper are: first, to determine the childs examination of the case in court demanding the setting ABH Court Law Act with SPPA angle.
Second, to determine the advantages and disadvantages of the examination of cases in court, according to Law ABH juvenile justice law with Law SPPA.テつ xA0Keywords: Comparative, investigation, Case, Children in conflict with the law(ABH), Juvenile Justice.
Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System essentially regulates the entire process of the settlement of juvenile facing legal problems which started the investigation stage to the stage of supervision after sentenced. If one’s refers to the old paradigm that the criminal justice system contained in the Criminal Procedure Code which has put four components of criminal justice, namely the police, prosecutors, courts and the Penitentiary, which are acted as the integral system, but in fact there exists the Penitentiary advisor also. So, It is necessary to analise in how to find out and to understand the position of Penitentiary advisor in a juvenile criminal justice system in particular. In sum, based on a broad range of function of the Penitentiary advisor, which spread from the investigation to the decision on Juvenile sentence, the Advisor Community has the seminal position. The opinion aforementioned describe that there are some issues that need to be understood regarding the formal understanding on how the actual existence of the Penitentiary Supervisor and the report based on the public research or the consideration of Penitentiary advisor with regard to law enforcement officers, especially in the juvenile justice system.
![Tahun Tahun](http://riaugreen.com/photo/dir022015/riaugreen_Sosialisasi-UU-11-Tahun-2012-Tentang-Sistem-Peradilan-Pidana-Pada-Anak-dan-Perempuan-.jpg)
![Uu no 11 2012 tentang sistem peradilan pidana anak Uu no 11 2012 tentang sistem peradilan pidana anak](/uploads/1/2/5/4/125466876/307259320.png)
In sum, this writing should be valuable not only in order to constitute Juvenile Criminal System actual aims and purposes, but also the extent of the implications of the report of the public research to the decision in juvenile criminal system. Keywords: Penitentiary Advisor, Juvenile, Criminal Justice System.
Dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak (SPPA), mereka disebut dengan istilah “anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum”. Si anak yang menusuk temannya dengan senjata tajam disebut dengan anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum, sedangkan anak yang menjadi korban penusukan disebut dengan anak korban.